Samuel Snowden v. Poulan/Weed Eater, No. 06-2664 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - employment discrimination. Dismissal of employment discrimination suit affirmed as plaintiff did not timely file the prerequisite EEOC complaint.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2664 ___________ Samuel Snowden, Appellant, v. Poulan/Weed Eater, Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: February 2, 2007 Filed: February 5, 2007 ___________ Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Samuel Snowden appeals the district court s1 preservice dismissal of his employment-discrimination action. Having conducted de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Snowden untimely filed the prerequisite 1 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, then United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, now United States Circuit Judge. administrative charge of discrimination, and the circumstances he alleged did not warrant equitable tolling or estoppel. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
