United States v. Tyler J. Berglund, No. 06-1836 (8th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. The broad waiver defendant executed in the case waived his right to appeal his sentence; the waiver is enforced and the case is dismissed.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1836 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Tyler Joseph Berglund, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: June 6, 2007 Filed: June 22, 2007 ___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Tyler Joseph Berglund (Berglund) appeals the 282-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed after Berglund pled guilty to drug conspiracy and firearms charges. In a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his counsel argues that the district court s sentence was [e]rroneously [e]xaggerated by a [m]isapplication of the Sentencing Guidelines and that the court erred in failing to grant a greater downward departure at sentencing. 1 The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota. We enforce the broad appeal waiver included in Berglund s plea agreement because (1) the plea colloquy reflects that Berglund understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, including the waiver; (2) this appeal falls within the scope of the waiver; and (3) no injustice would result. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), for any nonfrivolous issue not covered by the waiver, we find none. Therefore, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. We also grant counsel s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.