Paul Love v. Curators of the University of, No. 06-1816 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. District court did not err in dismissing complaint based on its determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1816 ___________ Paul Love, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Curators of the University of * Missouri; BTi Employee Screening * [UNPUBLISHED] Services; Bill Mitchell, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: July 5, 2007 Filed: August 3, 2007 ___________ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Paul Love appeals the district court s1 order dismissing his action based on the court s determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the parties reached a settlement agreement at their August 23, 2005 meeting, and that the terms of the agreement are embodied in the transcript of the meeting. See Chaganti & Assocs., 1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. P.C. v. Nowotny, 470 F.3d 1215, 1221 (8th Cir. 2006) (appeals court reviews for clear error district court s finding that settlement agreement existed), cert. denied, 75 U.S.L.W. 3569 (U.S. June 18, 2007) (No. 06-1377). In addition, we find nothing in the record to support Love s unsubstantiated claim that he was coerced into the agreement. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
