United States v. Andres Manuel Romero, No. 06-1173 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in finding Amendment 591 to the Guidelines did not affect defendant's sentence.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1173 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Andres Manuel Romero, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: August 30, 2007 Filed: September 6, 2007 ___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Andres Romero appeals the district court s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, in which he sought a reduction of his federal drug sentence based on Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We agree with the district court that Amendment 591 does not affect Romero s sentence, and Romero has not argued any other basis for modification under § 3582(c)(2). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Romero s pending appellate motions. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
