Yoram Raz v. Robert Mueller, No. 05-3752 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Defendants' judgment on claims the FBI harassed plaintiff is affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3752 ___________ Yoram Raz, Appellant, v. Robert M. Mueller, Director, United States Department of Justice; United States of America, Appellees. ---------------------------------------Yoram Raz, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee. * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. [UNPUBLISHED] * * * * * * * * * ___________ Submitted: February 7, 2007 Filed: February 9, 2007 ___________ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Yoram Raz challenges the adverse judgment entered by the district court1 after a bench trial on Raz s claims based on the FBI s alleged campaign of surveillance and harassment of him. For reversal, Raz argues the district court abused its discretion in limiting essential discovery, in limiting evidence, and in refusing to sanction the opposing parties. Following careful review, we find no abuse of the district court s discretion with regard to these matters, and we affirm for the reasons cited in the district court s thorough memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
