Algie R. Neal v. Eniva Corporation, No. 05-3305 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Employment discrimination. Employer's summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3305 ___________ Algie R. Neal, Appellant, v. Eniva Corporation, Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: September 7, 2006 Filed: September 22, 2006 ___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Algie Neal appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII suit claiming race discrimination against his former employer, Eniva Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review), we find the district court s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
