Radu Rasidescu v. University of MN, No. 05-3087 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3087 ___________ Radu Rasidescu, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. University of Minnesota; University of * Minnesota Graduate School, Twin * [UNPUBLISHED] Cities Campus; University of * Minnesota, School of Physics and * Astronomy, Department of Astronomy; * Evan Skillman; Leonard Kuhi; * Liliya L.R. Williams, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: July 19, 2006 Filed: July 31, 2006 ___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Radu Rasidescu appeals the district court s1 dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Reviewing de novo, see Mosby v. Ligon, 418 F.3d 927, 1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 931 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that dismissal was proper, because Rasidescu alleged insufficient facts to establish diversity or federal-question jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1331, 1332. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
