United States v. Moore, No. 21-2431 (7th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court reducing Defendant's life sentence to a term of 420 months for his conviction of conspiring to distribute at least fifty grams of crack cocaine and of being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that Defendant was not entitled to relief on his claims of error.

Because Defendant had four prior drug convictions under Illinois law the district court imposed a mandatory term of life in prison. More than a decade later, Defendant moved for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018. The district court reduced Defendant's life sentence but decided not to apply Mathis v. United States, 479 U.S. 500 (2016), under which Defendant's guideline and statutory ranges would have been reduced. The Seventh Circuit affirmed, holding (1) there is no reason that any further consideration of Defendant's Mathis argument would have changed the court's determination; (2) Defendant was not entitled to relief on his disparity argument; and (3) the district court's comments about the weapons found at Defendant's home were not improper.

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on October 5, 2022.

Primary Holding

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's decision reducing Defendant's life sentence to a term of 420 months for drug- and firearm-related offenses, holding that Defendant was not entitled to relief on his claims of error.


Disclaimer: Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.