Christine Bryant v. Compass Group U.S.A., Inc., No. 20-1443 (7th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 5, 2020.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 30, 2020 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge ILANA D. ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 20 1443 CHRISTINE BRYANT, Plaintiff Appellee, v. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC., Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 19 C 6622 Virginia M. Kendall, Judge. O R D E R Defendant Appellant Compass Group, Inc., filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 19, 2020. No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing, but to amend the opinion as follows, on page 16 of the slip opinion, to add two new sentences after the first sentence under heading II.D.: “Bryant’s claim under section 15(a) is a separate matter. Importantly, Bryant alleged only a claim under the provision of that section requiring development of a “written policy, made available to the public, establishing a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information,” not under the provision requiring compliance with the established retention schedule and destruction guidelines. Our analysis is thus limited to the theory she invoked. Section 15(a) obligates private entities … .” No. 20 1443 Page 2 With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
