United States v. Lacy, No. 15-2740 (7th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseLacy was indicted for distribution of heroin, 21 U.S.C. 841(a). With prior drug convictions, Lacy faced a maximum term of incarceration of 30 years. Lacy pled guilty and waived his appeal rightts. The government agreed to allow Lacy to cooperate and recommend a reduction for substantial assistance, and recommend a sentence at the low end of the guideline range. During the plea hearing, Lacy acknowledged that he understood his appeal rights and that he agreed to waive them. The government honored its promises and recommended a sentence of 168 months. At the close of its presentation, the government asked that Lacy’s federal sentence run consecutively to any sentence that he would receive for pending state‐court charges, referring to the request “as a courtesy” to the state prosecutor. The court sentenced Lacy to 168 months, to be served consecutively to any state sentence. Lacy’s counsel made a record of his objection to the imposition of a consecutive sentence without specifying the grounds for his objection. Lacy pleaded guilty to the state charges and received a 20-year sentence. The Seventh Circuit dismissed because Lacy had waived his right to appeal, but expressed “reservations about the way in which the consecutive sentence was imposed.”
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.