Aparicio-Brito v. Lynch, No. 14-3062 (7th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseAfter Aparicio-Brito’s fourth arrest for driving under the influence, the government commenced deportation proceedings, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(A)(i).. Aparicio-Brito, a citizen of Mexico who entered the U.S. in 1998, did not challenge removability, but focused his efforts on suppressing the government’s evidence regarding his alienage and applying for cancellation of removal. An immigration judge (IJ) denied his suppression motions and application, finding that the government sufficiently demonstrated that Aparicio-Brito had entered the U.S. without inspection, and that cancellation of removal and voluntary departure would be improper because of Aparicio-Brito’s inability to demonstrate continuous presence in the U.S., good moral character, and extreme hardship on family members upon deportation. The Board of Immigration Appeals rejected his arguments that the IJ and the government had violated his due process rights before and during the proceedings, and challenging the IJ’s conclusions regarding alienage, cancellation of removal, and voluntary departure. The Seventh Circuit denied a petition for review, finding that the IJ and the government complied with their statutory responsibilities; adequately demonstrated his alienage; and correctly denied Aparicio-Brito’s application for cancellation of removal based on his inability to demonstrate 10 years of continuous physical presence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.