Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Subscribe
Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar Inc., No. 12-1723 (7th Cir. 2014)Annotate this Case
This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 9, 2014.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604 October 16, 2014 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 12 1723 WARNETHER A. MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 09 cv 2172 CATERPILLAR, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee. Michael P. McCuskey, Judge. O R D E R On consideration of the Petition For Panel Rehearing filed by Plaintiff Appellant on October 7, 2014, all members of the original panel have voted to DENY the Petition For Panel Rehearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition For Panel Rehearing is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued in the above entitled case on September 9, 2014, is hereby amended as follows: On page 5: in the second full paragraph, the last sentence starting We are not persuaded ... is deleted; Appeal no. 12 1723 Page 2 On pages 5 6: the last paragraph of page 5 (starting First, Muhammad s argument ... ) ending on page 6 is deleted. On page 6: the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified so that Second, even if we set that problem aside, another more is replaced by A , so that the sentence reads A fundamental obstacle .... On page 8: the first full paragraph (starting The first problem is ... ) is deleted, and the first two sentences of the second full paragraph are deleted, such that the second full paragraph begins with Muhammad has not identified ... -2-