Gillian Emery v. Frank Gallo, No. 08-1315 (7th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on July 20, 2009.

Download PDF
In The United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit _________________ N o. 08-1315 IN RE: FRAN K GALLO, Debtor-A ppellee. APPEAL OF: GILLIAN A. EM ERY _________________ Ap p eal from th e Un ited States District Cou rt for th e Cen tral District of Illin ois. N o. 2:07-cv-02182-M PM -DGB--M ichael P. McCuskey, Chief Judge. __________________ ON M OTION TO FILE BILL OF COSTS IN STAN TER SEPTEM BER 23, 2009* ___________________ RIPPLE, Circuit Judge (in ch am bers). Ap p ellee Fran k Gallo asks th is cou rt to allow h is bill of costs to be filed late. Th e cou rt en tered * This op inion is being released initially in typescript form . N o. 08-1315 Page 2 ju d gm en t in M r. Gallo s favor on Ju ly 20, 2009, an d aw ard ed h im costs. Fed eral Ru le of Ap p ellate Proced u re 39(d ) says, A p arty w h o w an ts costs taxed m u st w ith in 14 d ays after en try of ju d gm en t file w ith th e circu it clerk, w ith p roof of service, an item ized an d verified bill of costs. M r. Gallo s bill of costs w as d u e on Au gu st 3, 2009, bu t h e d id n ot file h is bill of costs by th at d ate. In stead , h e filed a m otion to file th e bill of costs in stan ter tw o d ays later, on Au gu st 5, 2009. Fed eral Ru le of Ap p ellate Proced u re 26(b) allow s th e cou rt to exten d th e tim e p rescribed by th e ru les or p erm it an act to be d on e after th at tim e exp ires if a p arty sh ow s good cau se for th e d elay. In Denofre v. Transportation Ins. Rating Bureau, 560 F.2d 859, 860-61 (7th Cir. 1977), th is cou rt d en ied a requ est to file a late bill of costs, h old in g th at th e Bu reau h ad n ot sh ow n good cau se to p ersu ad e th e cou rt to exercise its d iscretion to allow th e late filin g. Th e Bu reau attem p ted to sh ow good cau se by exp lain in g th at it h ad received th e cou rt s op in ion th ree bu sin ess d ays before th e bill w as d u e an d th at th e attorn ey of record w as absen t from th e office d u rin g th e relevan t tim e. Id. Th e cou rt h eld th at th e m ere in atten d an ce to th e d aily ch ores in on e s law office d oes n ot con stitu te good cau se. Id. at 861. It fu rth er n oted th at th ere h ad been su fficien t tim e for cou n sel to file a m otion for an exten sion of tim e to file th e bill of costs. Id. Th e op in ion in Denofre w as circu lated to all ju d ges in regu lar active service an d n o ju d ge requ ested th at th e m atter be reh eard en ban c. Id. at 861, n . 4; see Cir. R. 40. In h is m otion to file h is bill of costs in stan ter, M r. Gallo exp lain ed th at th e bill of costs w as late becau se h e n eed ed to coord in ate betw een variou s m em bers of th e ap p eals team to accu m u late th e in form ation n ecessary for th e calcu lation of costs in th is m atter. Wh en th is cou rt requ ested m ore in form ation , h e exp lain ed th at d eterm in in g th e am ou n t of m on ey sp en t on cop ies took lon ger th an exp ected becau se th e firm s com p osin g th e ap p ellate team are located in d ifferen t tow n s. M r. Gallo s attem p t to sh ow good cau se falls sh ort of th is cou rt s exp ectation s as articu lated in Denofre. M r. Gallo d oes n ot ad equ ately exp lain w h y com m u n ication betw een team m em bers in d ifferen t N o. 08-1315 Page 3 location s d elayed th e filin g of th e bill of costs beyon d th e 14-d ay d ead lin e. M oreover, even if com m u n ication w as d ifficu lt, M r. Gallo cou ld h ave filed a m otion to exten d tim e to file th e bill of costs in w h ich h e exp lain ed th e exten u atin g circu m stan ces. Con sid eration s of stare d ecisis an d th e even -h an d ed treatm en t of litigan ts requ ires th at th is cou rt follow circu it p reced en t. Accord in gly, M r. Gallo s requ est to file h is bill of costs in stan ter is d en ied . D EN IED