United States v. Matthew Tyler, No. 21-2880 (6th Cir. 2022)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 22a0004n.06 No. 21-2880 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MATTHEW TYLER, Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED Jan 04, 2022 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Before: GRIFFIN, DONALD, and BUSH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. A jury convicted defendant Matthew Tyler of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, and he has served a little more than half of his 324-month sentence. Citing the COVID-19 pandemic (and health conditions that place him at greater risk should he contract the virus),1 Tyler moved in June 2021 for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The district court denied the motion for lack of an “extraordinary and compelling reason[]” to grant release, noting that infection rates at Tyler’s prison were extremely low and that he was fully vaccinated against the virus. After the district court issued its order, we held that “a defendant’s incarceration during the COVID-19 pandemic—when the defendant has access to the COVID-19 vaccine—does not present an ‘extraordinary and compelling reason’ 1 He also sought relief because he has served more time in prison than his codefendants but, on appeal, he does not take issue with the district court’s rejection of this argument. Since he has abandoned this argument, we will not address it here. See Bard v. Brown Cnty., 970 F.3d 738, 751 (6th Cir. 2020). No. 21-2880, United States v. Tyler warranting a sentence reduction” under § 3582(c)(1)(A). United States v. Lemons, 15 F.4th 747, 751 (6th Cir. 2021) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Traylor, 16 F.4th 485, 487 (6th Cir. 2021) (per curiam). Our precedent thus confirms that, because Taylor has access to the vaccine, he did not show an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.