In re Ormet Corp., No. 20-8007 (6th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8024-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8014-1(c). File Name: 20b0008n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: ORMET CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; ORMET PRIMARY ALUMINUM CORPORATION; ORMET ALUMINUM MILL PRODUCTS CORPORATION; SPECIALTY BLANKS HOLDINGS CORPORATION; SPECIALTY BLANKS, INC.; FORMCAST DEVELOPMENT INC.; ORMET RAILROAD CORPORATION, Debtors. > No. 20-8007 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. No. 2:04-bk-51255—C. Kathryn Preston, Judge. Decided and Filed: September 28, 2020 Before: DALES, PRICE SMITH, and WISE, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges. _________________ LITIGANT ON BRIEF: Jeffrey D. Butler, Jackson, Tennessee, pro se. _______________________ OPINION AND ORDER _______________________ JESSICA E. PRICE SMITH, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. The issue on appeal before the Panel is whether the bankruptcy court erred in denying Jeffrey Butler’s motion for a new hearing. After reviewing the record, Mr. Butler’s brief, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court did not err in denying Mr. Butler’s motion as moot. The bankruptcy case has concluded and there is no further relief available. we AFFIRM. Accordingly,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
