Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Lance Himes, No. 16-4027 (6th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 18, 2018.
Download PDF
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0115p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. > LANCE HIMES, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, Defendant-Appellant. No. 16-4027 On Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Decided and Filed: June 21, 2018 Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, SUTTON, COOK, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges. _________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. No. 16-4027 Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, et al. v. Himes Page 2 The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
