Sheppard v. Robinson, No. 13-3165 (6th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, convicted of murder and sentenced to death, seeks to reopen his federal habeas case in light of Martinez v. Ryan, which was decided a month before petitioner filed his petition for certiorari in his federal habeas case. The court concluded that Gonzalez v. Crosby is controlling in this case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion where this court has already held that the Supreme Court’s decision in Martinez and its follow-on decision in Trevino v. Thaler, are not “extraordinary” within the meaning of Rule 60(b)(6). Further, petitioner was not diligent in seeking relief from the Supreme Court on direct review in his habeas case.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.