Rupert v. Daggett, No. 11-1134 (6th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseOtteren was driving behind his travel companion, Daggett, when Daggett made an illegal U-turn. As Otteren repeated Daggett’s U-turn, his vehicle cut off a motorcycle being driven by Rupert, resulting in his death. Rupert’s widow sued Daggett under the theory that the accident was a reasonably foreseeable result of Daggett’s own negligence because she knew Otteren was following her. The district court granted summary judgment to Daggett upon holding, under Michigan law, that Otteren’s operation of his own vehicle constituted a superseding, intervening cause that cut off any liability on Daggett’s part. The Sixth Circuit reversed, finding that the plaintiff raised genuine issues of material fact as to each element of the prima facie negligence case.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.