Morrison v. Colley, No. 06-4216 (6th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on October 12, 2006.
Download PDF
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0361p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 06-4216 v. > , MICHAEL F. COLLEY et al., Defendants-Appellees. N Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. No. 06-00644 George C. Smith, District Judge. CHARLES R. MORRISON et al., Argued: September 20, 2006 Decided and Filed: September 22, 2006 Before: SILER, GILMAN, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: David R. Langdon, LANGDON & HARTMAN LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants. Patrick J. Piccininni, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: David R. Langdon, Curt C. Hartman, Joshua B. Bolinger, LANGDON & HARTMAN LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, Christopher P. Finney, FINNEY, STAGNARO, SABA & KLUSMEIER CO., L.P.A., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants. Patrick J. Piccininni, Nick A. Soulas, Jr., PROSECUTING ATTORNEY S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ______________________ INTERIM OPINION ______________________ PER CURIAM. Charles R. Morrison challenges the defendants actions that have prevented him from being placed on the ballot to run as an independent candidate for Congress from the 15th Congressional District in Ohio. On September 12, 2006, the district court denied Morrison s request for injunctive relief that would have required the defendants to place him on the ballot. This appeal followed. Having considered the record, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel, the panel is of the unanimous opinion that the judgment of the district court should be AFFIRMED. We reach this conclusion essentially for the reason that, despite any constitutional infirmities that may exist in the relevant Ohio statutes as they might apply to others, there is no reasonable basis for Morrison to claim in good faith that he is not affiliated with a political party. A more detailed opinion will 1 No. 06-4216 Morrison et al. v. Colley et al. Page 2 follow as soon as practicable. This abbreviated opinion is issued in the interim due to the urgent need for Ohio election officials to proceed with their preparations for the upcoming election.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
