Fasken Land and Minerals v. NRC, No. 23-60377 (5th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 23-60377 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60377 Summary Calendar ____________ FILED March 27, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited; Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners, Petitioners, versus Nuclear Regulatory Commission; United States of America, Respondents. ______________________________ Appeal from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Agency No. 72-1051 ______________________________ Before Jones, Elrod, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* In September 2021 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a license to Interim Storage Partners, LLC, to establish a facility to store nuclear waste temporarily in Andrews County, Texas. See Texas v. Nuclear Regul. Comm’n, 78 F.4th 827, 833–35 (5th Cir. 2023) [hereinafter Texas v. NRC], reh’g en banc denied, 2024 WL 1108700 (5th Cir. Mar. 14, _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-60377 Document: 95-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2024 No. 23-60377 2024). Texas, Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd., (Fasken), and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners (PBLRO) petitioned this court to set aside that license. Id. at 834–35. In that appeal, a panel of this court first held that Fasken and PBLRO had standing under the Constitution and the Hobbs Act to challenge the NRC’s actions. Id. at 835–40. It then held that the NRC lacked statutory authority to issue the license. Id. at 840–44. Accordingly, this court granted the petitions for review and vacated the license. Id. at 844. The NRC filed a petition for rehearing en banc on October 24, 2023, which this court denied on March 14, 2024. See Texas v. Nuclear Regul. Comm’n, No. 21-60743, --- F.4th ----, 2024 WL 1108700 (5th Cir. Mar. 14, 2024). Shortly before the panel issued its opinion in Texas v. NRC, Fasken and PBLRO filed the petition for review at issue in this case. They challenge a different license issued by the NRC in May 2023 to Holtec International to establish a facility to store nuclear waste in Lea County, New Mexico. The parties, correctly, agree that Texas v. NRC involved a “materially identical license in a materially identical procedural posture” and that “absent the [c]ourt granting rehearing en banc in Texas [v. NRC] . . . , the panel’s consideration of this case will be controlled by [Texas v. NRC].” Because this court’s holding in Texas v. NRC dictates the outcome here, we GRANT Fasken’s and PBLRO’s petition for review and VACATE the Holtec license. The NRC’s motion to transfer the petition for review to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is DENIED AS MOOT. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
