NLRB v. Southwest Displays, No. 22-60032 (5th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 22-60032 Document: 00516226064 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-60032 FILED March 4, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, versus Southwest Displays and Events, doing business as SWXGlobal Design & Production, Respondent. Application for Summary Entry of a Judgment of the National Labor Relations Board NLRB No. 16-CA-264618 Before Smith, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Southwest Displays and Events makes and delivers tradeshow exhibits. With certain exclusions, all its employees performing “production work” in its Dallas-based plant belong to a Union. The Union’s relationship with Southwest, though, turned sour in the summer of 2020. That was when * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 22-60032 Document: 00516226064 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2022 No. 22-60032 Southwest withdrew its recognition of the Union. 1 It also refused to give the Union requested health-and-safety information. The Union complained to the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB filed a complaint against Southwest. An Administrative Law Judge found that Southwest violated the National Labor Relations Act by both withdrawing its recognition of the Union and refusing to provide it with the requested health-and-safety information. The NLRB’s Board then transferred the case to itself. It informed Southwest that it had about a month to file exceptions to the ALJ’s decision. See 29 C.F.R. § 102.46. Otherwise, the ALJ’s decision was liable to stick. See id. § 102.48. Southwest never did. The Board adopted the ALJ’s decision, and now asks us for a summary entry of judgment to enforce its order. Congress has provided that “[n]o objection that has not been urged before the Board . . . shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.” 29 U.S.C. § 160(e). And we have emphasized that “fail[ing] to comply with the [Board’s] regulations requiring the filing of written exceptions” entitles the Board to summary entry of judgment. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 310 F.2d 565, 566 (5th Cir. 1962) (per curiam). Southwest, for its part, does not dispute the facts. It only disputes that its conduct amounted to an FLSA violation. But that is a merits dispute, and disputing the merits is not the kind of extraordinary circumstance that exempts companies from the Board’s procedural rules. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Petitioner’s application for summary entry of a judgment enforcing an order of the NLRB is GRANTED. 1 Southwest about-faced its withdrawal of recognition about a year later, in June 2021. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
