Golden v. City of Longview, No. 22-40785 (5th Cir. 2023)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 22-40785 Document: 00516962517 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 9, 2023 No. 22-40785 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Kevin Rashaan Golden, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus City of Longview, Public Works Division; Rolin McPhee, Director, City of Longview Public Works; Chi Ping Stephen Ha, Supervisor, Traffic Engineering Department; Keith Covington, Assistant Supervisor, Traffic Engineering Department; Mary Ann Miller, Human Resources Director; Unknown Parties, Interested parties within Gregg County, Texas, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:20-CV-620 ______________________________ Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Haynes and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Pro se plaintiff Kevin Rashaan Golden appeals the dismissal of his _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-40785 Document: 00516962517 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/09/2023 No. 22-40785 claims alleging that he was illegally fired on account of his disability. See Golden v. City of Longview, No. 6:20-CV-00620-JDK, 2021 WL 3829126, at *10 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2021) (recommendation to dismiss claims against City employees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Golden v. City of Longview, No. 6:20-CV-620JDK-JDL, 2021 WL 3809265, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021) (adopting recommendation); Golden v. City of Longview, No. 6:20-CV-00620-JDL, 2022 WL 2704533, at *11 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2022) (summary judgment dismissing remaining ADA claims); Golden v. City of Longview, 2022 WL 16625713, at *9 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2022) (same). Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.