USA v. Robinson, No. 22-30004 (5th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 22-30004 Document: 00516541926 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 22-30004 consolidated with Nos. 22-30005, 22-30014 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 10, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Clarence Robinson, Jr., Defendant—Appellant, consolidated with _____________ No. 22-30011 _____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Clarence Robinson, Defendant—Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 3:20-CR-25-1, 3:20-CR-26-1, 3:94-CR-26-1, 3:20-CR-24-1 Case: 22-30004 Document: 00516541926 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2022 No. 22-30004 c/w Nos. 22-30005, 22-30014, 22-30011 Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Clarence Robinson, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Robinson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the records reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. There is a clerical error in the written judgment in No. 22-30004. Robinson was sentenced to a total of 36 months of imprisonment, but the judgment in No. 22-30004 incorrectly states that his total term of imprisonment is 30 months. This is a purely clerical error that “did not substantively alter” the sentence. United States v. Spencer, 513 F.3d 490, 492 (5th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we REMAND No. 22-30004 for the limited purpose of correcting that error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
