USA v. Angel Alvarado, No. 20-50083 (5th Cir. 2020)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 12, 2020 No. 20-50083 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Angel Alvarez Alvarado, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-52-1 Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Angel Alvarez Alvarado pleaded guilty, without the benefit of a plea agreement, to possession of a firearm after felony conviction and was sentenced to 51 months of imprisonment. He challenges the district court’s application of a sentencing enhancement, under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B), * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2020 No. 20-50083 based on his possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense. Here, the unrebutted presentence report stated that in addition to the firearm, Alvarado possessed 51 grams of cocaine, individually packaged for distribution, and that he admitted to selling cocaine for monetary compensation. The district court did not clearly err by applying the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement based on its plausible determination that Alvarado was engaged in drug trafficking. See § 2K2.1, comment. (n.14(B)(ii)); United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146-48 (5th Cir. 2013). Alvarado’s unsupported speculation that he might have intended to consume rather than distribute all of the cocaine he possessed is unpersuasive and insufficient to demonstrate clear error. See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 146. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.