Spell, et al v. Edwards, et al, No. 20-30712 (5th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-30712 Document: 00515897377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 11, 2021 No. 20-30712 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Mark Anthony Spell; Life Tabernacle Church, Plaintiffs—Appellants, versus John Bel Edwards, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as Governor of the State of Louisiana; Roger Corcoran, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Chief of Police of Central City, Louisiana; Sid Gautreaux, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, Defendants—Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:20-CV-282 Before Wiener, Elrod, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* This case arises out of a series of executive proclamations issued by Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards in response to the COVID-19 * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-30712 Document: 00515897377 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2021 No. 20-30712 pandemic. Some of these proclamations imposed capacity restrictions on inperson religious worship gatherings. Plaintiffs, a pastor and his church, brought suit, alleging inter alia that these proclamations violated their rights under the Free Exercise Clause. The district court entered a final judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims. In its opinion, the district court applied rational basis review to determine that the plaintiffs had not stated a claim for violation of the Free Exercise Clause and also determined that the plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief were moot. In making its determinations, the district court did not have the benefit of considering the Supreme Court’s recent cases regarding how the Free Exercise Clause applies in the particular context of state-imposed COVID-19 restrictions on religious worship. See Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141 S. Ct. 63, 67–69 (2020) (applying strict scrutiny to certain COVID-19 restrictions, and enjoining New York from enforcing COVID-19 restrictions on indoor worship); S. Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 716 (2021) (enjoining California from enforcing its COVID-19-related ban on indoor worship); Tandon v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 1294, 1297–98 (2021) (applying strict scrutiny to California’s restriction on private religious gatherings, and enjoining California from enforcing those restrictions). We express no opinion on the merits of this case or the immunity defenses raised by the defendants, which the district court should review in the first instance. 2 Case: 20-30712 Document: 00515897377 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/11/2021 No. 20-30712 We VACATE the final judgment in this case and REMAND for the district court to analyze the plaintiffs’ claims for damages1 in light of Supreme Court authority. 1 Plaintiffs expressly waived their claims for preliminary or interim injunctive relief. In their reply brief, Plaintiffs disclaimed any desire to present their claim for a permanent injunction in this appeal but stated that they intend to pursue it if they are successful on remand. We leave that issue to the district court in the first instance. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
