USA v. Gage, No. 20-20346 (5th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-20346 Document: 00516148177 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 29, 2021 No. 20-20346 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Jeramy Jerome Gage, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-336-1 Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Jeramy Jerome Gage, federal prisoner # 72053-279, appeals from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion requesting a reduction in his sentence based on the danger of COVID-19 in light of his alleged health issues. Gage’s motion to stay the appeal is denied. * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-20346 Document: 00516148177 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2021 No. 20-20346 The Government moves to dismiss the appeal because Gage argues that compassionate release is warranted based on specific family circumstances that were not presented to the Bureau of Prisons or to the district court prior to the denial of Gage’s reconsideration motion. We may pretermit the exhaustion issue where, as here, the case can easily be resolved on the merits. See United States v. Franco, 973 F.3d 465, 467 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 920 (2020). Thus, we deny the Government’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with further briefing as unnecessary and deny the alternative motion to extend the deadline for the appellee’s brief. See United States v. Bailey, 924 F.3d 1289, 1290 (5th Cir. 2019). Gage’s motion to supplement the record on appeal with a letter from his child’s caregiver is denied. See Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson, 185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999). To the extent that Gage renews the arguments he raised in the district court regarding his prison disciplinary record and a family member’s health, he has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for compassionate release. See United States v. Thompson, 984 F.3d 431, 433 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2688 (2021); United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
