United States v. Ortega, No. 20-10491 (5th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
While on supervised release, Ortega admitted to drug violations. The district court revoked Ortega’s supervised release and sentenced her to an additional two years in prison and one year of supervised release, with a condition requiring Ortega to “reside in [a] Reentry Center and successfully participate in [a] Residential Reentry Program for a period of at least 4 months to be released at the direction of the probation officer” and to “initially participate in [the Reentry Program’s] community corrections component,” but Ortega “may become eligible the last one-third of the term of confinement for placement in [the Program’s] prelease component upon approval of the program review team.” Ortega did not initially object to the condition, but later argued that the condition “impermissibly delegated authority to the probation officer by allowing the probation officer to determine the duration of a residential treatment program.”
The Fifth Circuit affirmed. A court errs when it surrenders “‘the final say’ on whether to impose a condition” or leaves to probation the details of a condition involving “a ‘significant deprivation of liberty,’” but does not err when it assigns a probation officer reasonable authority to supervise participation in a treatment program, including the program’s “modality, intensity, and duration.” The district court’s modest delegation of supervisory authority was proper; the special condition is specific and restrictive and directs probation to release Ortega within a particularized eight-month window, subject to its superior knowledge of Ortega’s situation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.