Hewitt v. Helix Engy Solutions, No. 19-20023 (5th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 20, 2020.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ___________ FILED March 9, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk No. 19-20023 ___________ Michael J. Hewitt, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Helix Energy Solutions Group, Incorporated; Helix Well Ops, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CV-2545 ______________________________ ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion April 20, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 956 F.3d 341, withdrawn) (Opinion December 21, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 983 F.3d 789) Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: No. 19-20023 A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed January 18, 2021, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated December 21, 2020, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc filed May 18, 2020, is DENIED AS MOOT. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
