USA v. Rufus Kariuki, No. 19-10080 (5th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 19-10080 Document: 00515306367 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/11/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 19-10080 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, February 11, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellee, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. RUFUS KIMANGI KARIUKI, also known as Robert P. Johnson, also known as Mark Edward, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-110-1 Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rufus Kimangi Kariuki has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Kariuki has filed responses and a motion for leave to file an addendum to his first response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 19-10080 Document: 00515306367 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/11/2020 No. 19-10080 relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Kariuki’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Kariuki’s motion for leave to file an addendum is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.