Tang Chen v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen, No. 18-60106 (5th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 18-60106 Document: 00514858691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-60106 Summary Calendar FILED March 4, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk TANG CHEN, Petitioner v. WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Tang Chen timely petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny relief. After this appeal was filed, the BIA entered an order vacating its prior decision and substituting a new decision which did not alter the outcome or reasoning. No subsequent petition for review was filed. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 18-60106 Document: 00514858691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2019 No. 18-60106 We requested supplemental briefing on our jurisdiction in light of this event. Having considered that briefing and the applicable law, we conclude that an explicit vacatur of a prior decision by the BIA divests this court of jurisdiction. Espinal v. Holder, 636 F.3d 703, 705-06 (5th Cir. 2011). Because Chen did not file a timely petition for review of the new BIA order, we lack jurisdiction to consider it. Moreira v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 709, 713 (5th Cir. 2007). DISMISSED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
