USA v. Jesus Esquivel, No. 18-50060 (5th Cir. 2018)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 18-50060 Document: 00514676816 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 18-50060 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 10, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS HUMBERTO ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:17-CR-220-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Humberto Esquivel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Esquivel has not filed a response. While counsel addresses the validity of the appeal waiver in Esquivel’s plea agreement, counsel does not discuss the district court’s compliance with Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 18-50060 Document: 00514676816 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/10/2018 No. 18-50060 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. An appellate waiver does not waive the district court’s compliance with Rule 11 or the need for counsel to brief the issue adequately in an Anders brief. See United States v. Carreon-Ibarra, 673 F.3d 358, 362 n.3 (5th Cir. 2012); United States v. Brown, 328 F.3d 787, 78990 (5th Cir. 2003). However, our independent review confirms that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. We thus concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Therefore, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.