Mason James v. Teresa Anderson, et al, No. 18-40815 (5th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 18-40815 Document: 00514977207 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-40815 Summary Calendar FILED May 30, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MASON JAMES, Plaintiff - Appellant v. TERESA A. ANDERSON; HAZEL J. ENGLISH; A. WALKER; FRANCISCO VILLAEGAS, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:17-CV-160 Before BARKSDALE, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mason James, Texas prisoner # 670604, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison employees. On at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, James has filed an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See, Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 18-40815 Document: 00514977207 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2019 No. 18-40815 e.g., James v. Fank, 784 F. App’x 246 (5th Cir. 2018) (noting James was subject to the three-strikes bar); James v. Hoel, No. 7:02-CV-239 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2002); James v. Hart, No. 7:02-CV-192 (N.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2002). Therefore, he is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). James totally failed in district court (and in his brief here made only conclusory assertions) to show that he is under the requisite imminent danger of serious physical injury. Therefore, the magistrate judge improvidently granted him leave to proceed IFP on appeal. See, e.g., Cloud v. Stotts, 455 F. App’x 534, 535 (5th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, James’ IFP status is decertified, and his appeal is dismissed. Should he wish to reinstate his appeal, James has 30 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee to the clerk of the district court. IFP DECERTIFIED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
