Jesse Curry, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director, No. 18-20354 (5th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 18-20354 Document: 00514916315 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-20354 Summary Calendar April 15, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JESSE RANDOLPH CURRY, JR., Petitioner-Appellant v. LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CV-2119 Before JONES, ELROD, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jesse Randolph Curry, Jr., Texas prisoner # 939167, moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion for leave to file a proposed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. The Rule 60(b) motion challenged the denial of Curry’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition, which attacked his Texas aggravated assault conviction. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 18-20354 Document: 00514916315 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2019 No. 18-20354 Curry argues that the motion for leave to file was improperly denied on the ground that his Rule 60(b) motion was time barred. To the extent that Curry was required to obtain a COA, he has not shown that reasonable jurists could conclude that the district court erred in denying the motion for leave to file a Rule 60(b) motion. See Hernandez v. Thaler, 630 F.3d 420, 428 (5th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, his request for a COA is DENIED. To the extent that he does not need a COA, the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. See Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. Unit A Jan. 1981). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.