USA v. Angel Limon, No. 18-20042 (5th Cir. 2018)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 18-20042 Document: 00514581091 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-20042 Conference Calendar FILED August 1, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANGEL MARIN LIMON, also known as Americo Martinez Limon, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-497-1 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel Marin Limon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Limon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 18-20042 Document: 00514581091 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2018 No. 18-20042 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We note, however, that there is a clerical error in the written judgment. Although no term of supervised release was imposed, the judgment sets forth “special conditions of supervised release.” Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. Hernandez, 719 F. App’x 395, (5th Cir. 2018); United States v. Perez-Gonzalez, 294 F. App’x 854, 855 (5th Cir. 2008). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.