Melvin Grayer v. James Filliyaw, et al, No. 17-60715 (5th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 17-60715 Document: 00514634982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-60715 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2018 MELVIN GRAYER, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellant v. JAMES FILLIYAW, Warden, Pearl River Central Mississippi Correctional Facility; RONALD KING; JEWARSAI MALLET; JERRY WILLIAMS; JANE AND JOHN DOES, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:16-CV-709 Before JONES, ELROD, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Melvin Grayer, Texas prisoner # 08710, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court dismissed Grayer’s § 1983 claim with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim after determining that the claim Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-60715 Document: 00514634982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2018 No. 17-60715 was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and the district court certified that an appeal is not taken in good faith on that basis. By moving to proceed IFP, Grayer is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). However, Grayer does not dispute that he sought monetary damages from the defendants, nor does he address the district court’s determination that his § 1983 claim was barred by Heck, which was the basis for the district court’s certification decision. Thus, he has not shown that “the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, his motion to proceed IFP on appeal is denied, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of the complaint by the district court and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous constitute two strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Grayer is WARNED that accumulating a third strike will preclude him from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
