USA v. Carol Morris, No. 17-51125 (5th Cir. 2018)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 17-51125 Document: 00514637275 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-51125 Summary Calendar FILED September 11, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS, Defendant–Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:97-CR-10-1 Before CLEMENT, OWEN, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carol Johnene Morris, former federal prisoner # 76547-080 and current Texas prisoner # 1681899, moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in her appeal from the district court’s order denying her a motion for free transcripts to file a third motion for coram nobis relief. Morris’s brief focuses on appealing the denial of coram nobis relief in the district court’s order of August 8, 2016, which was the subject of a prior appeal. She has not addressed her eligibility Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-51125 Document: 00514637275 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2018 No. 17-51125 for a transcript nor has she addressed this court’s sanction order, which resulted from the prior appeal. Although pro se briefs are liberally construed, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Morris has abandoned all nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Morris has not shown that her appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits, leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.