USA v. Raudy Mendez-Diaz, No. 17-41207 (5th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 17-41207 Document: 00514533472 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-41207 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff−Appellee, versus RAUDY MANUEL MENDEZ-DIAZ, Also Known as Raudy Manuel Mendez, Also Known as Raudy Mendez Diaz, Defendant−Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 5:17-CR-314-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Raudy Mendez-Diaz has moved for Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-41207 Document: 00514533472 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2018 No. 17-41207 leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendez-Diaz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.