Phillip Haskett v. Capital Land Services, Inc., et, No. 16-40035 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 16-40035 Document: 00513777768 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40035 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 30, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk PHILLIP DAVID HASKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CAPITAL LAND SERVICES, INCORPORATED, also known as CLS Group; JASON WALKER; MATT TIPTON, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CV-279 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Phillip David Haskett appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his complaint. He fails to show that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motions for extensions of time to complete discovery and respond to the summary judgment motion. See Am. Family Life Assur. Co. of Columbus v. Biles, 714 F.3d 887, 894 (5th Cir. 2013); Adams v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-40035 Document: 00513777768 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2016 No. 16-40035 Connecticut, 465 F.3d 156, 161 (5th Cir. 2006). By failing to raise his claims of error in the district court, he waived review of his arguments that the district court erred in granting summary judgment without further notice and considered inadmissible evidence. See Celanese Corp. v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., 620 F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir. 2010); Donaghey v. Ocean Drilling & Expl. Co., 974 F.2d 646, 650 n.3 (5th Cir. 1992). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2