USA v. Rodney Stubblefield, No. 16-20189 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 16-20189 Document: 00513788536 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-20189 Summary Calendar FILED December 7, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RODNEY STUBBLEFIELD, also known as “Big”, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-194-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Stubblefield has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Stubblefield has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-20189 Document: 00513788536 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2016 No. 16-20189 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2