USA v. Chris Vorhies, No. 15-51193 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 15-51193 Document: 00513763660 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-51193 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRIS WENDELL VORHIES, also known as Lurch, also known as Chris Voerhis, also known as Chris Vorhies, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:14-CR-189-33 Before KING, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Chris Wendell Vorhies has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vorhies has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Vorhies’s claims of ineffective Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 15-51193 Document: 00513763660 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2016 No. 15-51193 assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Vorhies’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2