United States v. Huor, No. 15-50174 (5th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseAfter defendant was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C. 16911 et seq., he was sentenced to a prison term followed by ten years of supervised release. On appeal, defendant challenged five conditions of supervised released. The court found that the district court acted within its discretion by imposing a special condition requiring defendant to undergo sex offender treatment; the district court abused its discretion by imposing a special condition prohibiting purchase, possession, or use of sexually stimulating materials; the district court also erred, as a matter of law, by imposing a special condition requiring defendant to "follow all other lifestyle restrictions . . . imposed by the therapist"; the judgment must be reformed to omit a special condition prohibiting defendant from "residing or going to places" frequented by minors without permission from his probation officer because that special condition was not pronounced orally at sentencing; and the judgment must be reformed to omit a "standard" sex offender treatment condition that largely overlapped with, but materially differed from, the similar "special" condition that was orally pronounced at sentencing and included separately in the written judgment. Finally, the court rejected defendant's challenges to a discrete aspect of the treatment condition, concluding that the district court retained its power to sentence defendant and did not improperly delegate it to the doctor.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on March 14, 2017.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.