USA v. Victor Blancas-Rosas, No. 15-40524 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 15-40524 Document: 00513410572 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40524 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 8, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. VICTOR MANUEL BLANCAS-ROSAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-728 Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Victor Manuel Blancas-Rosas appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. We affirm. Blancas-Rosas first contends that the district court improperly participated in plea negotiations in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1). Even if we assume that the district court’s pretrial comments amounted to improper participation, we find that any violation of Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 15-40524 Document: 00513410572 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2016 No. 15-40524 Rule 11 was harmless. See United States v. Davila, 133 S. Ct. 2139, 2148-50 (2013); United States v. Crowell, 60 F.3d 199, 205 (5th Cir. 1995). BlancasRosas did not plead guilty, and his trial and sentencing were fair and impartial. See Crowell, 60 F.3d at 205. Blancas-Rosas’s other claims concern the application of the Sentencing Guidelines and are reviewed for plain error. See United States v. RodriguezParra, 581 F.3d 227, 229 (5th Cir. 2009). To show plain error, he must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affected his substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he does so, we have discretion to correct the error if it seriously affects the integrity, fairness, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings. See id. If an alleged legal error is subject to reasonable dispute, it is not clear or obvious. Rodriguez-Parra, 581 F.3d at 231. In his first guideline claim, Blancas-Rosas asserts that an eight-level “aggravated felony” increase was improper because a 2005 Texas conviction was not for a generic theft offense and was therefore not an aggravated felony. We need not examine the 2005 conviction because Blancas-Rosas’s two subsequent illegal reentry convictions qualify as aggravated felonies, even though they were based on the 2005 conviction. See United States v. GamboaGarcia, 620 F.3d 546, 548-49 (5th Cir. 2010); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(O). In any event, we have previously rejected Blancas-Rosas’s argument that the Texas crime of theft is not generic theft. See United States v. RodriguezSalazar, 768 F.3d 437, 438 (5th Cir. 2014). Rodriguez-Salazar is not in conflict with our prior decision in Martinez v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 532 (5th Cir. 2008). See Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d at 438. In addition, Blancas-Rosas has failed to show that he was entitled to credit for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Although in 2 Case: 15-40524 Document: 00513410572 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/08/2016 No. 15-40524 some cases, going to trial does not preclude credit for acceptance of responsibility, this is not such a case. See § 3E1.1, comment. (n.2). BlancasRosas agreed to admit the operative facts only if he could go free, and he presented the factual defense that he was brought into the United States involuntarily. Further, he persistently raised legal arguments that were frivolous and irrelevant. The decision to deny credit for acceptance of responsibility was not without foundation. See United States v. Rudzavice, 586 F.3d 310, 315 (5th Cir. 2009). The judgment is AFFIRMED. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.