United States v. Holley, Jr., No. 15-40360 (5th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for conspiracy to commit a drug trafficking crime, felon in possession of a firearm, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. The court affirmed the denial of the three motions to suppress, concluding that the good faith exception applies to the disputed dog sniffs where they were "close enough to the line of validity" that an objectively reasonable officer would not have realized that the Gray Wolf Trail and Winterwood Lane warrants were tainted. The court also concluded that there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant of all three counts. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.