United States v. Franklin, No. 15-20622 (5th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the mental health program special condition of his supervised release. The court concluded that the district court's written judgment creates an ambiguity regarding whether the district court intended to delegate authority not only to implement treatment but to decide whether treatment was needed. Therefore, the court vacated the special condition and remanded for resentencing with the same clarifying instructions the court offered in United States v. Lomas.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.