USA v. Pedro Gonzalez-Francisco, No. 14-40456 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 14-40456 Document: 00513448327 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40456 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 1, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO GONZALEZ-FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13-CR-1443 Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Gonzalez-Francisco has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Francisco has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Francisco’s response. We concur Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-40456 Document: 00513448327 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2016 No. 14-40456 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Gonzalez-Francisco’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.