Naomi Sandres v. U.S. Middle Dist Court of LA, No. 14-30200 (5th Cir. 2014)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-30200 Document: 00512688790 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-30200 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 7, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk NAOMI SANDRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA CHIEF JUDGE BRIAN ANTHONY JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC. No. 3:13-CV-809 Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Naomi Sandres filed this action in the United States District Court naming the United States Middle District Court of Louisiana, Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson as the Defendant-Appellee in the proceedings. Sandres s complaint primarily encompassed allegations against Chief Judge Jackson with respect to the various rulings he rendered against her in other Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-30200 Document: 00512688790 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2014 No. 14-30200 cases that were previously pending before the District Court. 1 The action filed against Chief Judge Jackson was reassigned to United States District Judge James J. Brady who dismissed Sandres s suit as frivolous, additionally citing to judicial immunity and lack of jurisdiction. Sandres appeals herein. Sandres s appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983) (per curiam); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Sandres appealed those cases and this Court affirmed, issuing a sanctions warning. See Sandres v. La. Div. of Admin., 551 F. App x 95, 101 (5th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (unpublished). 1 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.