United States v. Gutierrez-Mendez, No. 12-40709 (5th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction and sentence for conspiring to harbor illegal aliens for commercial advantage or private financial gain. The court concluded that the district court erred in admitting bad-act evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) but the error was harmless. The court also concluded that the district court did not err in applying an enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2L1.1(b)(5) for brandishing a dangerous weapon, U.S.S.G. 2L1.1(b)(6) for intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of serious bodily injury, and U.S.S.G. 2L1.1(b)(7) for causing substantial bodily harm. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.