United States v. Akins, et al., No. 12-40515 (5th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendants appealed their conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine, 50 grams or more of cocaine base, and 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana. The court concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony of a Secret Service agent regarding the meaning of code words used by the conspirators on wiretapped recordings; the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony of a DEA Group Supervisor concerning the interpretation of coded drug slang; the evidence was sufficient to convict defendants; the district court did not err in assigning Defendant Edwards an aggravating-role sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. 3B1.1(b) and for firearm possession under U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(b)(1); the district court did not err in applying a career offender enhancement under U.S.S.G. 4B1.1 to Defendant Gage's sentence; in Defendant Atkins' case, any error committed by the sentencing judge in looking to the higher crack cocaine calculation of 280 grams was harmless; the sentencing judge did not violate United States v. Booker in sentencing Defendant Perkins; and Akins' argument that the district court violated Apprendi v. New Jersey by increasing his maximum sentence based on his two prior felony drug convictions was foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent. Accordingly, the court affirmed the convictions and sentences.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on March 27, 2014.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.