United States v. Kinchen, No. 12-30340 (5th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for knowingly distributing at least 50 grams of cocaine base. The court concluded that the district court was incorrect in stating that the testimony regarding the prior possession and concomitant statement were intrinsic evidence. The court concluded, however, that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the prejudicial effect of such evidence did not substantially outweigh its probative value. The court further concluded that there was no error in the procedure followed by the district court with respect to defendant's brother's testimony and defendant's sentence was procedurally and substantively reasonable. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.