United States v. Dignam, No. 12-30262 (5th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed her conviction for mail fraud, arguing that the district court violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161-3174. Defendant directed the Governor's Program on Abstinence, a state-funded organization formed to facilitate abstinence education in Louisiana schools. Defendant was accused and later convicted of orchestrating a scheme to fraudulently direct state funds to her son. Because the court concluded that the delays prompted by defense counsel's motions to continue, and by the parties' joint notice of intent to enter a guilty plea, were properly excludable under the Act, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.